SEO Information

Why Pay-Per-Inclusion Search Engines are Dying


A Pay-Per-Inclusion search engine is a service in which a search engine charges you a certain amount to spider and include your website in its database. For this fee, regular repeated spiderings are guaranteed, so you are sure to be indexed.

However, rankings are not guaranteed. These pages have no advantage over any page submitted for free. A few years ago, pay-per-inclusion search engines such as Inktomi, Altavista, Ask Jeeves and Yahoo were introduced. However, they have failed badly and have lost traffic to Google.

Why Google is Tops

Google built the LARGEST search engine database because it refused to adopt the pay-per-inclusion model. By allowing every website to submit its pages free, it built an enormous database of websites. Good news for everyone searching Google's database!

Google's competitors were unable to deliver the same results, partly because they had fewer websites to choose from. If you charge for entry into a search engine, you eliminate over 90% of the websites on the Net which cannot justify such a fee.

What the pay-per-inclusion search engines did not understand was that their real customers were the ADVERTISERS and not the searchers. Nor were the websites the customers of the engines.

The advertisers pay the search engines, so they are the customers. Google recognised this and decided to keep the advertisers happy by providing a large database of websites. This large database became well known and it attracted great numbers of searches. These searches were exposed to the advertisers' products and the searches led to good sales. To make this most efficient, search engine submission must be free.

Search Engine Model is Similar to Television

This is all similar to television where programmes are made for the masses and given away free. Then the advertisers step in and make the money! As a search engine survives by the quality of its search results, surfers and sites flocked to Google making it the number one search engine.

Why the Death of Pay-Per-Inclusion SE's is Good for Small Sites

Only large quality SE databases can fulfil the needs of surfers. Your relationships with the search engines is one of mutual benefit. You need the traffic and the search engines provide the quality content.

Therefore by creating good websites with quality content and submitting them free to the search engines, you are both winning. There is no need to spend enormous amounts on search engine submission and optimisation. All you need to do is create good websites with the appropriate keywords for your pages and everything else will take care of itself.

Of course, this is where we were at the beginning of the Internet revolution, except certain search engines got too greedy and thought they could cash in on unfortunate small website owners!

John Lynch

For a review of Site Build It - the leading website and store building software package which encourages good content for high search engine rankings go to: http://www.merchant-account-service.com/sitebuildit.html


MORE RESOURCES:


Is SEO dead? -  VENTS Magazine

How to Make SEO Happen in 2020  Practical Ecommerce





SEO myths busted by an ex-Googler  Search Engine Land















How Does SEO Work?  JumpFly PPC Advertising News

Four ways to improve your SEO results in 2020  Baltimore Business Journal



How SEO Can Improve Your Business  Jewish Link of New Jersey



Managing Successful SEO Migrations  Search Engine Journal







How Google's BERT Works In SEO  Business 2 Community












How to Boost SEO for Coworking Spaces  Commercial Property Executive


Google Update November 2019  Search Engine Journal
























Poll: After The SEO Audit; Next Steps  Search Engine Roundtable





















What Does It Mean to ‘Do SEO’?  Search Engine Journal




home | site map
© 2006